SAKARIYA JATIN MAHESHBHAI vs UNION OF INDIA — 2273/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAH220911342026
Filing Number
2274/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
2273/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAKARIYA JATIN MAHESHBHAI
Adv. V V ISANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court rejected the accused's bail application in a GST Act case, finding that the accused was improperly shown as the main conspirator in the arrest memo despite no GST registration in their name, and that serious procedural defects existed in the arrest process. However, the court ultimately granted bail with stringent conditions, noting that while economic offences require serious consideration, the investigation was still ongoing and procedural violations in the arrest warranted interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
09-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad City
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 2273/2026
The court rejected the accused's bail application in a GST Act case, finding that the accused was improperly shown as the main conspirator in the arrest memo despite no GST registration in their name, and that serious procedural defects existed in the arrest process. However, the court ultimately granted bail with stringent conditions, noting that while economic offences require serious consideration, the investigation was still ongoing and procedural violations in the arrest warranted interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts