AKHIL GUJARAT GENERAL MAJDOOR SANGH vs GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD. — 136/2018
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th May 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJAH170004682018
Filing Number
136/2018
Filing Date
31-07-2018
Registration No
136/2018
Registration Date
31-07-2018
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AKHIL GUJARAT GENERAL MAJDOOR SANGH
Adv. GOG
Respondent(s)
GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD.
JAYESH CONSTRUCTION CO.
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | For award |
| 11-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 04-02-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 07-01-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal of Ahmedabad dismissed the workers' reference (IT No. 136/2018) filed by the All Gujarat General Labor Union against Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited and a contractor, finding that the workers failed to substantiate their claims with adequate evidence and witness testimony. The tribunal held that the contractor labor system appeared to be genuine based on proper tender procedures and licensing requirements, and rejected the workers' demands for permanent employee status, wage parity, and back wages totaling Rs. 10,000 per worker. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal of Ahmedabad dismissed the workers' reference (IT No. 136/2018) filed by the All Gujarat General Labor Union against Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited and a contractor, finding that the workers failed to substantiate their claims with adequate evidence and witness testimony. The tribunal held that the contractor labor system appeared to be genuine based on proper tender procedures and licensing requirements, and rejected the workers' demands for permanent employee status, wage parity, and back wages totaling Rs. 10,000 per worker. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts