GUJARAT MAJDOOR SABHA, vs KALPTARU POWER TRANSMISSION LTD. — 55/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: For Production of Document. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.

CNR: GJAH170001552024

For Production of Document

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

46/2024

Filing Date

29-05-2024

Registration No

55/2025

Registration Date

29-05-2024

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD

Judge

5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

GUJARAT MAJDOOR SABHA,

Adv. L

Respondent(s)

KALPTARU POWER TRANSMISSION LTD.

PADMAVATI MEN POWER SUPPLIERS,

PARSHWANATH SHWETA LABOUR SUPPLLIERS,

NISHITA LABOUR CONTRACTOR

ANITA ENTERPRISE

ESSEL ENGINEERING WORKS

JAY GOGA CONTRACTOR

AKASH LABOUR CONTRACTOR

Hearing History

Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

08-05-2026

For Production of Document

03-04-2026

For Production of Document

13-03-2026

For Production of Document

05-03-2026

For Production of Document

12-02-2026

For Production of Document

Interim Orders

06-10-2025
ORDER
03-11-2025
ORDER

Case Summary: Reference (I.T.) 55/2025 Outcome: Application disposed; case adjourned for further proceedings. The Industrial Tribunal rejected the employer's request to decide preliminarily whether contractor arrangements are "sham and bogus" before addressing other demands. The Tribunal held that while the High Court directed adjudication of this issue first, it constitutes a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence from both parties. Defendants (contractors) are directed to file written statements by the next hearing, after which both sides must submit evidence on demands 1 and 2 regarding the nature of the contract arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Reference (I.T.) 55/2025 Outcome: Application disposed; case adjourned for further proceedings. The Industrial Tribunal rejected the employer's request to decide preliminarily whether contractor arrangements are "sham and bogus" before addressing other demands. The Tribunal held that while the High Court directed adjudication of this issue first, it constitutes a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence from both parties. Defendants (contractors) are directed to file written statements by the next hearing, after which both sides must submit evidence on demands 1 and 2 regarding the nature of the contract arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case