GUJARAT MAJDOOR SABHA, vs KALPTARU POWER TRANSMISSION LTD. — 55/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: For Production of Document. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJAH170001552024
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
46/2024
Filing Date
29-05-2024
Registration No
55/2025
Registration Date
29-05-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GUJARAT MAJDOOR SABHA,
Adv. L
Respondent(s)
KALPTARU POWER TRANSMISSION LTD.
PADMAVATI MEN POWER SUPPLIERS,
PARSHWANATH SHWETA LABOUR SUPPLLIERS,
NISHITA LABOUR CONTRACTOR
ANITA ENTERPRISE
ESSEL ENGINEERING WORKS
JAY GOGA CONTRACTOR
AKASH LABOUR CONTRACTOR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
For Production of Document
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | For Production of Document |
| 03-04-2026 | For Production of Document |
| 13-03-2026 | For Production of Document |
| 05-03-2026 | For Production of Document |
| 12-02-2026 | For Production of Document |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Reference (I.T.) 55/2025 Outcome: Application disposed; case adjourned for further proceedings. The Industrial Tribunal rejected the employer's request to decide preliminarily whether contractor arrangements are "sham and bogus" before addressing other demands. The Tribunal held that while the High Court directed adjudication of this issue first, it constitutes a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence from both parties. Defendants (contractors) are directed to file written statements by the next hearing, after which both sides must submit evidence on demands 1 and 2 regarding the nature of the contract arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Reference (I.T.) 55/2025 Outcome: Application disposed; case adjourned for further proceedings. The Industrial Tribunal rejected the employer's request to decide preliminarily whether contractor arrangements are "sham and bogus" before addressing other demands. The Tribunal held that while the High Court directed adjudication of this issue first, it constitutes a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence from both parties. Defendants (contractors) are directed to file written statements by the next hearing, after which both sides must submit evidence on demands 1 and 2 regarding the nature of the contract arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts