SHRI VIJLI KARMACHARI MAHAMAND,GANDHINAGAR. vs CHIF ENGINEER GUJARAT STATE ILE-CORPORATION,GANDHINAGAR. Advocate - A D TRIVEDI — 37/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 15th April 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJAH170000962022
Filing Number
37/2022
Filing Date
28-03-2022
Registration No
37/2022
Registration Date
28-03-2022
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI VIJLI KARMACHARI MAHAMAND,GANDHINAGAR.
Adv. A
Respondent(s)
CHIF ENGINEER GUJARAT STATE ILE-CORPORATION,GANDHINAGAR. Advocate - A D TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of first party
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | For award |
| 04-02-2026 | For Argument of first party |
| 07-01-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 03-12-2025 | For Argument of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Tribunal rejected the worker's reference seeking modification of his birth date in service records from 01/06/1964 to 03/12/1969. The tribunal held that since the worker joined service in 1998 with a school leaving certificate showing the earlier date, and failed to make the correction within two years as per regulations, his claim filed 13 years after joining—just before retirement—was time-barred and lacked merit. The tribunal found no illegality in the employer's refusal to amend records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal rejected the worker's reference seeking modification of his birth date in service records from 01/06/1964 to 03/12/1969. The tribunal held that since the worker joined service in 1998 with a school leaving certificate showing the earlier date, and failed to make the correction within two years as per regulations, his claim filed 13 years after joining—just before retirement—was time-barred and lacked merit. The tribunal found no illegality in the employer's refusal to amend records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts