GENERAL WORKS AND UTTAR GUJARAT BIDI KAMDAR UNION vs CHIEF ENGINEER, GUJARAT WATER SUPPLY AND SENITATION BOARD, KALOL Advocate - A D TRIVEDI — 2/2020
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: For Evidence of Second party. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
REF IT - REFERENCE I.T.
CNR: GJAH170000202020
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
2/2020
Filing Date
18-01-2020
Registration No
2/2020
Registration Date
18-01-2020
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, AHMEDABAD
Judge
5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GENERAL WORKS AND UTTAR GUJARAT BIDI KAMDAR UNION
Adv. R A DAVE
Respondent(s)
CHIEF ENGINEER, GUJARAT WATER SUPPLY AND SENITATION BOARD, KALOL Advocate - A D TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
| 15-04-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
| 11-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
| 07-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
| 04-02-2026 | For Hearing of Priliminary Point/Contention |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Industrial Tribunal at Ahmedabad dismissed the interim relief petition filed by workers seeking protection of their employment conditions pending final adjudication of their industrial dispute. The court held that since the employer-employee relationship between the workers and the institution has not been established on record, interim relief cannot be granted at this stage, as the workers' claim to be permanent employees remains disputed and requires full trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Industrial Tribunal at Ahmedabad dismissed the interim relief petition filed by workers seeking protection of their employment conditions pending final adjudication of their industrial dispute. The court held that since the employer-employee relationship between the workers and the institution has not been established on record, interim relief cannot be granted at this stage, as the workers' claim to be permanent employees remains disputed and requires full trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts