MANAGER SHREE, BANK OF BARODA vs RAMILABA PRAVINSINH SOLANKI — 30/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJAH150002672024

Filing Number

30/2024

Filing Date

18-Mar-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

18-Mar-2024

Court

Taluka Court, Detroj

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANAGER SHREE, BANK OF BARODA

    Adv. R A SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMILABA PRAVINSINH SOLANKI

  2. 2.RANADHIRSINH HEMANTSINH SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    Summary In this regular civil case, the Principal Senior Civil Judge of Betrojaa ruled partially in favor of Bank of Baroda against defendants Ramilaba and Randhirsinh regarding a loan dispute. The court ordered defendant No. 1 to pay the bank ₹2,28,944.37 (principal amount of ₹5,00,000 with accrued interest) at 9% per annum from the date of the judgment, and permitted the bank to recover this amount from defendant No. 1's property; defendant No. 2 (guarantor) was held jointly liable. The court also directed the defendants to bear the case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 01-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 13-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 27-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 30-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 19-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 05-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 04-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 26-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 07-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 19-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 27-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 03-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 15-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 26-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 22-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 18-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this regular civil case, the Principal Senior Civil Judge of Betrojaa ruled partially in favor of Bank of Baroda against defendants Ramilaba and Randhirsinh regarding a loan dispute. The court ordered defendant No. 1 to pay the bank ₹2,28,944.37 (principal amount of ₹5,00,000 with accrued interest) at 9% per annum from the date of the judgment, and permitted the bank to recover this amount from defendant No. 1's property; defendant No. 2 (guarantor) was held jointly liable. The court also directed the defendants to bear the case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case