KURESHI ALTAFBHAI USHMANGANI vs RANJITJI KANAJI THAKOR Advocate - A.G.KACHOT — 463/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 12th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJAH120005732022
Filing Number
463/2022
Filing Date
05-07-2022
Registration No
463/2022
Registration Date
05-07-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KURESHI ALTAFBHAI USHMANGANI
Adv. M Z BAREJIYA
Respondent(s)
RANJITJI KANAJI THAKOR Advocate - A.G.KACHOT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 04-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 01-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 463/2022 The court convicted the accused, Ranjitji Kanaji Thakor, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 30,000 drawn on insufficient funds. The petitioner, Kureshi Altafbhai Ushmangani, had loaned money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued a post-dated cheque as repayment, but it was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving proper notice and demand, the accused failed to repay within 15 days, satisfying all statutory requirements for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 463/2022 The court convicted the accused, Ranjitji Kanaji Thakor, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 30,000 drawn on insufficient funds. The petitioner, Kureshi Altafbhai Ushmangani, had loaned money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued a post-dated cheque as repayment, but it was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving proper notice and demand, the accused failed to repay within 15 days, satisfying all statutory requirements for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts