KURESHI ALTAFBHAI USHMANGANI vs RANJITJI KANAJI THAKOR Advocate - A.G.KACHOT — 463/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH120005732022

Filing Number

463/2022

Filing Date

05-Jul-2022

Registration No

463/2022

Registration Date

05-Jul-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDAL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KURESHI ALTAFBHAI USHMANGANI

    Adv. M Z BAREJIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJITJI KANAJI THAKOR Advocate - A.G.KACHOT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 463/2022 The court convicted the accused, Ranjitji Kanaji Thakor, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 30,000 drawn on insufficient funds. The petitioner, Kureshi Altafbhai Ushmangani, had loaned money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued a post-dated cheque as repayment, but it was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving proper notice and demand, the accused failed to repay within 15 days, satisfying all statutory requirements for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 04-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 28-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 15-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 30-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 16-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 10-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 14-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 21-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 12-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 14-May-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 18-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 04-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 04-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 01-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 02-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 06-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 04-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 03-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 01-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 27-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 05-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 08-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 11-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 02-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 18-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 14-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 17-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 09-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 15-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 24-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 13-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 25-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 14-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 08-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 03-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 05-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 463/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 463/2022 The court convicted the accused, Ranjitji Kanaji Thakor, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 30,000 drawn on insufficient funds. The petitioner, Kureshi Altafbhai Ushmangani, had loaned money to the accused based on trust, and the accused issued a post-dated cheque as repayment, but it was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving proper notice and demand, the accused failed to repay within 15 days, satisfying all statutory requirements for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case