JAY DIVAKAR SHUKLA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 113/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJAH100009122026

Filing Number

113/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

113/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31103260049801

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAY DIVAKAR SHUKLA

    Adv. M B DODIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY The court approved the petitioner's plea under Sections 457 and 503 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ordering the release of seized bank funds totaling Rs. 11,299.25 (frozen across Union Bank of India and Indian Bank accounts). The court found that the petitioner, who allegedly suffered an online fraud loss, was entitled to recovery of the frozen amounts as the investigating officer confirmed the case was falsely registered. The court directed the petitioner to furnish a bond and provide necessary details to the investigating officer for crediting the released funds back to the petitioner's bank account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court approved the petitioner's plea under Sections 457 and 503 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ordering the release of seized bank funds totaling Rs. 11,299.25 (frozen across Union Bank of India and Indian Bank accounts). The court found that the petitioner, who allegedly suffered an online fraud loss, was entitled to recovery of the frozen amounts as the investigating officer confirmed the case was falsely registered. The court directed the petitioner to furnish a bond and provide necessary details to the investigating officer for crediting the released funds back to the petitioner's bank account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case