JAY DIVAKAR SHUKLA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 113/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJAH100009122026
Filing Number
113/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
113/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VIRAMGAM
Judge
5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
31103260049801
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAY DIVAKAR SHUKLA
Adv. M B DODIYA
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The court approved the petitioner's plea under Sections 457 and 503 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ordering the release of seized bank funds totaling Rs. 11,299.25 (frozen across Union Bank of India and Indian Bank accounts). The court found that the petitioner, who allegedly suffered an online fraud loss, was entitled to recovery of the frozen amounts as the investigating officer confirmed the case was falsely registered. The court directed the petitioner to furnish a bond and provide necessary details to the investigating officer for crediting the released funds back to the petitioner's bank account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court approved the petitioner's plea under Sections 457 and 503 of the Criminal Procedure Code, ordering the release of seized bank funds totaling Rs. 11,299.25 (frozen across Union Bank of India and Indian Bank accounts). The court found that the petitioner, who allegedly suffered an online fraud loss, was entitled to recovery of the frozen amounts as the investigating officer confirmed the case was falsely registered. The court directed the petitioner to furnish a bond and provide necessary details to the investigating officer for crediting the released funds back to the petitioner's bank account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts