GUJARAT GOVERNMENT vs SHAILESHBHAI VIKRAMBHAI PATEL Advocate - N G THAKOR — 406/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJAH090004722023

Case disposed

Filing Number

406/2023

Filing Date

01-02-2023

Registration No

406/2023

Registration Date

01-02-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192050220202

Police Station

SANAND POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,338,304(A)
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

GUJARAT GOVERNMENT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHAILESHBHAI VIKRAMBHAI PATEL Advocate - N G THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

03-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

24-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, 304(a) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, finding that the prosecution failed to prove rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that mere occurrence of an accident does not presume rashness or negligence; there must be gross and culpable neglect of duty, and all allegations lacked credible corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, 304(a) and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, finding that the prosecution failed to prove rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that mere occurrence of an accident does not presume rashness or negligence; there must be gross and culpable neglect of duty, and all allegations lacked credible corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SANAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case