THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KANAIYALAL HIRALAL SHAH(Abated) Advocate - H.A.BADHIA — 104/2019
Case under Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Section 3,7. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAH010047502019
Filing Number
104/2019
Filing Date
12-Jun-2019
Registration No
104/2019
Registration Date
13-Jun-2019
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
4-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
VASTRAPUR POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. R P THAKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KANAIYALAL HIRALAL SHAH(Abated) Advocate - H.A.BADHIA
-
2.ARUNABEN W/O KANAIYALAL SHAH(Permanently exempted)
Adv. H.A.BADHIA
-
3.NIPABEN D/O KANAIYALAL SHAH
Adv. H.A.BADHIA
-
4.NIRAJ S/O KANAIYALAL HIRALAL SHAH
Adv. H.A.BADHIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Ahmedabad Sessions Court acquitted four accused (Kanaiyalal Shah and his family members) of charges under IPC Sections 306, 294(B), 498(A), 114, and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 and 7 in a case involving the death of a young married woman. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused abetted the victim's suicide through cruelty or harassment, as required by legal precedent; while circumstantial evidence of the victim's death by hanging existed, there was insufficient proof of direct causal link between the accused's alleged actions and her death to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
04-May-2026
Judgement
9th Addl District Judge
-
02-May-2026
Further Statement
9th Addl District Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
10th Addl District Judge
-
05-May-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
26-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jun-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jan-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
14-Aug-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Jun-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
30-Jan-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Nov-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
10-Oct-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Aug-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jun-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-May-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Apr-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jan-2022
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Dec-2021
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Oct-2021
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Sep-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Aug-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jun-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
27-Apr-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
15-Mar-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
03-Nov-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
9th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jul-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
04-May-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
27-Dec-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
11-Nov-2019
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
7th Addl District Judge
-
14-Oct-2019
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
7th Addl District Judge
-
17-Sep-2019
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
7th Addl District Judge
-
20-Jul-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2019
Summary The Ahmedabad Sessions Court acquitted four accused (Kanaiyalal Shah and his family members) of charges under IPC Sections 306, 294(B), 498(A), 114, and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 and 7 in a case involving the death of a young married woman. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused abetted the victim's suicide through cruelty or harassment, as required by legal precedent; while circumstantial evidence of the victim's death by hanging existed, there was insufficient proof of direct causal link between the accused's alleged actions and her death to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts