THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KANAIYALAL HIRALAL SHAH(Abated) Advocate - H.A.BADHIA — 104/2019
Case under Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Section 3,7. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAH010047502019
Filing Number
104/2019
Filing Date
12-06-2019
Registration No
104/2019
Registration Date
13-06-2019
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
4-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
VASTRAPUR POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. R P THAKAR
Respondent(s)
KANAIYALAL HIRALAL SHAH(Abated) Advocate - H.A.BADHIA
ARUNABEN W/O KANAIYALAL SHAH(Permanently exempted)
Adv. H.A.BADHIA
NIPABEN D/O KANAIYALAL SHAH
Adv. H.A.BADHIA
NIRAJ S/O KANAIYALAL HIRALAL SHAH
Adv. H.A.BADHIA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 02-05-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 27-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Ahmedabad Sessions Court acquitted four accused (Kanaiyalal Shah and his family members) of charges under IPC Sections 306, 294(B), 498(A), 114, and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 and 7 in a case involving the death of a young married woman. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused abetted the victim's suicide through cruelty or harassment, as required by legal precedent; while circumstantial evidence of the victim's death by hanging existed, there was insufficient proof of direct causal link between the accused's alleged actions and her death to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Ahmedabad Sessions Court acquitted four accused (Kanaiyalal Shah and his family members) of charges under IPC Sections 306, 294(B), 498(A), 114, and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3 and 7 in a case involving the death of a young married woman. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused abetted the victim's suicide through cruelty or harassment, as required by legal precedent; while circumstantial evidence of the victim's death by hanging existed, there was insufficient proof of direct causal link between the accused's alleged actions and her death to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts