MIHIR BIPINBHAI MOHANLAL SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 714/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010018172026
Filing Number
714/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
714/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
4-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191044250349
Police Station
GHATLODIA POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MIHIR BIPINBHAI MOHANLAL SOLANKI
Adv. H M MADHU
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mihir Bipinbhai Mohanlal Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Case 714/2026) The court rejected bail for accused Mihir Bipinbhai Mohanlal Solanki in an attempt to murder case under IPC Section 109(1). The court found that while co-accused were granted bail, Solanki's role as principal accused was more serious—he allegedly inflicted injuries with a stick and was the main conspirator. The court held that parity principle in bail cannot be mechanically applied when accused have different roles, and that granting bail would harm justice given the gravity of allegations and potential witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mihir Bipinbhai Mohanlal Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Case 714/2026) The court rejected bail for accused Mihir Bipinbhai Mohanlal Solanki in an attempt to murder case under IPC Section 109(1). The court found that while co-accused were granted bail, Solanki's role as principal accused was more serious—he allegedly inflicted injuries with a stick and was the main conspirator. The court held that parity principle in bail cannot be mechanically applied when accused have different roles, and that granting bail would harm justice given the gravity of allegations and potential witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts