STATE vs RAMAN DEEP SINGH — 418/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th March 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLWT010029442026

Case disposed

Filing Number

958/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

418/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

156-Special Judge

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

Moti Nagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. xyz

Respondent(s)

RAMAN DEEP SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 156-Special Judge

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

For Bail

16-03-2026

For Bail

13-03-2026

For Bail

11-03-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: STATE v. RAMAN DEEP SINGH (418/2026) The court dismissed Raman Deep Singh's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376/354A/354 (rape and sexual harassment). The accused was alleged to have engaged in a three-year relationship with the complainant under false pretenses, promising marriage while showing fake divorce papers, then making non-consensual intimate videos and threatening to misuse them. The court found the allegations serious and determined that granting bail posed risks of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE v. RAMAN DEEP SINGH (418/2026) The court dismissed Raman Deep Singh's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376/354A/354 (rape and sexual harassment). The accused was alleged to have engaged in a three-year relationship with the complainant under false pretenses, promising marriage while showing fake divorce papers, then making non-consensual intimate videos and threatening to misuse them. The court found the allegations serious and determined that granting bail posed risks of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case