STATE vs RAMAN DEEP SINGH — 418/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010029442026
Filing Number
958/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
418/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
156-Special Judge
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Moti Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
RAMAN DEEP SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 156-Special Judge
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 16-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 13-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 11-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: STATE v. RAMAN DEEP SINGH (418/2026) The court dismissed Raman Deep Singh's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376/354A/354 (rape and sexual harassment). The accused was alleged to have engaged in a three-year relationship with the complainant under false pretenses, promising marriage while showing fake divorce papers, then making non-consensual intimate videos and threatening to misuse them. The court found the allegations serious and determined that granting bail posed risks of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: STATE v. RAMAN DEEP SINGH (418/2026) The court dismissed Raman Deep Singh's anticipatory bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 376/354A/354 (rape and sexual harassment). The accused was alleged to have engaged in a three-year relationship with the complainant under false pretenses, promising marriage while showing fake divorce papers, then making non-consensual intimate videos and threatening to misuse them. The court found the allegations serious and determined that granting bail posed risks of evidence tampering, witness intimidation, and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts