SANTOSH DEVI vs ASHOK KR. VERMA — 936/2017
Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 30th March 2026.
CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSW010120922017
Filing Number
7032/2017
Filing Date
11-10-2017
Registration No
936/2017
Registration Date
12-10-2017
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
424-District Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH DEVI
Respondent(s)
ASHOK KR. VERMA
Hearing History
Judge: 424-District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-02-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 05-01-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Santosh Devi v. Ashok Kumar Verma (CS DJ 936/2017) The court decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Santosh Devi, awarding Rs. 10,00,000 with 18% interest (pre-suit, pendente lite, and future). The defendant's claim that the property was encumbered by pending litigation was rejected since the suit by plaintiff's brother was filed after the sale deed execution, thus no encumbrance existed at transfer. The court denied injunction and cancellation reliefs, holding that once property title transfers via registered sale deed, non-payment of partial consideration cannot invalidate the sale—recovery is the sole remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Santosh Devi v. Ashok Kumar Verma (CS DJ 936/2017) The court decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Santosh Devi, awarding Rs. 10,00,000 with 18% interest (pre-suit, pendente lite, and future). The defendant's claim that the property was encumbered by pending litigation was rejected since the suit by plaintiff's brother was filed after the sale deed execution, thus no encumbrance existed at transfer. The court denied injunction and cancellation reliefs, holding that once property title transfers via registered sale deed, non-payment of partial consideration cannot invalidate the sale—recovery is the sole remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts