PRATAP SINGH vs SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHI — 292/2024

Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section SPECIFICRELIEFACT. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSW010028982024

e-Filing Number

21-03-2024

Filing Number

1184/2024

Filing Date

22-Mar-2024

Registration No

292/2024

Registration Date

26-Mar-2024

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

424-District Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section SPECIFICRELIEFACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRATAP SINGH

    Adv. Ayush Acharjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHI

  2. 2.MRS JYOTISHMA TRIPATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy Of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Pratap Singh v. Santosh Kumar Tripathi & Mrs Jyotishma Tripathi (CS DJ No. 292/2024) The Delhi District Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 4 February 2024 for ₹1,57,00,000. The court found that the defendants refunded the plaintiff's ₹21 lakh advance payment at the plaintiff's own request after he sought an extension and expressed inability to arrange the balance amount by the due date (15 April 2024), thereby negating any breach by defendants. Additionally, the court held the plaintiff failed to demonstrate continuous financial readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligations through credible documentary evidence, which is mandatory for specific performance relief under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Judge

  9. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  10. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    District Judge

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  14. 25-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  17. 05-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  18. 05-Jul-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  20. 21-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 18-Dec-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  22. 18-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 13-Dec-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  24. 13-Dec-2024

    Order

    District Judge

  25. 22-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  26. 22-Nov-2024

    Order

    District Judge

  27. 21-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  28. 21-Nov-2024

    Order

    District Judge

  29. 04-Oct-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  30. 04-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  31. 10-Sep-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  32. 10-Sep-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  33. 10-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  34. 17-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  35. 04-May-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  36. 04-May-2024

    Issues

    District Judge

  37. 26-Mar-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  38. 26-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 22-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pratap Singh v. Santosh Kumar Tripathi & Mrs Jyotishma Tripathi (CS DJ No. 292/2024) The Delhi District Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 4 February 2024 for ₹1,57,00,000. The court found that the defendants refunded the plaintiff's ₹21 lakh advance payment at the plaintiff's own request after he sought an extension and expressed inability to arrange the balance amount by the due date (15 April 2024), thereby negating any breach by defendants. Additionally, the court held the plaintiff failed to demonstrate continuous financial readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligations through credible documentary evidence, which is mandatory for specific performance relief under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case