Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs Penila Edward Msangi — 75/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc Crl - MISC. CASES

CNR: DLST010032982026

e-Filing Number

20-03-2026

Filing Number

1104/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

18-Special Judge

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Vasant Kunj North

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

    Adv. Adeel Ahmed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Penila Edward Msangi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case 75/2026 Summary: The court allowed the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence's application to unlock the accused's phone for evidence collection, relying on the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy privacy precedent. The court held that assisting in phone unlocking to gather evidence does not violate privacy or self-incrimination rights, provided the accused's privacy is protected and personal details remain confidential unless investigation-necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Misc./ Appearance (Criminal)

    Special Judge

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 75/2026 Summary: The court allowed the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence's application to unlock the accused's phone for evidence collection, relying on the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy privacy precedent. The court held that assisting in phone unlocking to gather evidence does not violate privacy or self-incrimination rights, provided the accused's privacy is protected and personal details remain confidential unless investigation-necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case