DRI vs SHALINI MALIK — 407/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 8,21,23,29. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLST010025862026

Filing Number

820/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

407/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

18-Special Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 8,21,23,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHALINI MALIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Shalini Malik's interim bail application under Section 483 BNSS. The judge found that Malik made false statements in her bail petition—claiming no family member could care for her minor daughters when her 25-year-old elder daughter was available—and noted her involvement in another criminal case (Hyderabad). Considering the offense's gravity, criminal antecedents, and false submissions, interim bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Special Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 407/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Shalini Malik's interim bail application under Section 483 BNSS. The judge found that Malik made false statements in her bail petition—claiming no family member could care for her minor daughters when her 25-year-old elder daughter was available—and noted her involvement in another criminal case (Hyderabad). Considering the offense's gravity, criminal antecedents, and false submissions, interim bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case