AJEET SINGH (DAR) vs HINAN MANZOOR BHAT 45/ 25 DC — 712/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281/125(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSE010080252025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3806/2025

Filing Date

30-07-2025

Registration No

712/2025

Registration Date

30-07-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

2-PO (MACT)-01

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281/125(B)

Petitioner(s)

AJEET SINGH (DAR)

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

HINAN MANZOOR BHAT 45/ 25 DC

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PO (MACT)-01

13-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Misc. cases

22-01-2026

Misc. cases

30-07-2025

Misc. cases

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: MACT No. 712/25 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed petitioner HC Ajeet Singh's injury claim in default for non-prosecution. Despite repeated notices issued since July 2025, the petitioner failed to appear in court, citing medical leave and official leave as reasons. The court rejected these excuses, noting the petitioner was required to appear in his personal capacity as a victim, not as an official, making office leave irrelevant. The persistent absence demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the claim, warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

30-07-2025
COPY OF ORDER
22-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
27-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACT No. 712/25 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed petitioner HC Ajeet Singh's injury claim in default for non-prosecution. Despite repeated notices issued since July 2025, the petitioner failed to appear in court, citing medical leave and official leave as reasons. The court rejected these excuses, noting the petitioner was required to appear in his personal capacity as a victim, not as an official, making office leave irrelevant. The persistent absence demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the claim, warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case