STATE vs ARBAZ — 299/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSE010013832026

Case disposed

Filing Number

685/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket

Judge

9-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

355

Police Station

Hazrat Nizamuddin

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

ARBAZ

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Additional Sessions Judge

14-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

For Bail

24-02-2026

For Bail

17-02-2026

For Bail

06-02-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Summary: State v. Arbaz (Case 299/2026) The court dismissed Arbaz's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Arbaz was accused of stabbing his friend Aas Mohd with a knife on 24.12.2025 following an argument while drinking, causing grievous injuries, with the crime allegedly committed while under the influence of drugs. The court found the allegations serious in nature and determined that bail should not be granted due to the gravity of the offense, the grievous nature of injuries sustained by the victim, and the risk of witness tampering or evidence destruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
06-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
24-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State v. Arbaz (Case 299/2026) The court dismissed Arbaz's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Arbaz was accused of stabbing his friend Aas Mohd with a knife on 24.12.2025 following an argument while drinking, causing grievous injuries, with the crime allegedly committed while under the influence of drugs. The court found the allegations serious in nature and determined that bail should not be granted due to the gravity of the offense, the grievous nature of injuries sustained by the victim, and the risk of witness tampering or evidence destruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South-East , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case