SUSHILA DEVI vs STATE — 448/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNW010024592026

Filing Number

1326/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

448/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-West, RHC

Judge

439-Asj/Ftc Nw

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

190

Police Station

PREM NAGAR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Sushila Devi v. State (448/2026) The Delhi High Court dismissed Sushila Devi's bail application in a property fraud case involving charges under IPC sections 420/406/34. The court found that the accused and family members created multiple forged title document chains (at least four) for the same property to defraud multiple buyers, demonstrating deep planning and sophistication. With investigation ongoing and serious evidence of organized document forgery, the court determined no grounds for bail existed at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Ftc Nw

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Ftc Nw

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sushila Devi v. State (448/2026) The Delhi High Court dismissed Sushila Devi's bail application in a property fraud case involving charges under IPC sections 420/406/34. The court found that the accused and family members created multiple forged title document chains (at least four) for the same property to defraud multiple buyers, demonstrating deep planning and sophistication. With investigation ongoing and serious evidence of organized document forgery, the court determined no grounds for bail existed at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case