JAI BHAN AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS, (LAC-2/2023 KHERA KHURD) — 453/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--SATISFIED on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

EX. CIVIL - EXECUTION. CIVIL

CNR: DLNT010113342025

e-Filing Number

18-08-2025

Filing Number

8642/2025

Filing Date

19-Aug-2025

Registration No

453/2025

Registration Date

20-Aug-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SATISFIED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI BHAN AND ORS.

    Adv. Sunil Dahiya

  2. 2.inderjeet

    Adv. Sunil Dahiya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS, (LAC-2/2023 KHERA KHURD)

  2. 2.D.D.A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Summary: The District Court (Rohini, Delhi) disposed of the execution petition as satisfied on 22.05.2026. The court confirmed that payment had been received and directed the District Nazir to release the payment to the petitioners (DH) upon filing necessary documents and completing required formalities, noting no stay order was in effect from any higher court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  9. 21-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 453/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court (Rohini, Delhi) disposed of the execution petition as satisfied on 22.05.2026. The court confirmed that payment had been received and directed the District Nazir to release the payment to the petitioners (DH) upon filing necessary documents and completing required formalities, noting no stay order was in effect from any higher court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case