STATE vs BABU ASLAM — 467/2026
Case under Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLNT010027922026
Filing Number
836/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
467/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC
Judge
435-ASJ/Spl.FTC North
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
572
Police Station
Model Town
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Respondent(s)
BABU ASLAM
Hearing History
Judge: 435-ASJ/Spl.FTC North
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 12-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 11-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 467/2026 Summary: State vs. Babu Aslam The court granted regular bail to 22-year-old Babu Aslam, accused under Section 25 of the Arms Act, after he had been in judicial custody since November 2025. The court found that since the chargesheet had been filed, investigation was complete, co-accused persons with similar roles were already on bail, and the trial would take substantial time, there was no fruitful purpose in continued detention. Bail was granted on Rs. 40,000 personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-commission of similar offences, maintaining mobile contact with investigating officer, and refraining from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 467/2026 Summary: State vs. Babu Aslam The court granted regular bail to 22-year-old Babu Aslam, accused under Section 25 of the Arms Act, after he had been in judicial custody since November 2025. The court found that since the chargesheet had been filed, investigation was complete, co-accused persons with similar roles were already on bail, and the trial would take substantial time, there was no fruitful purpose in continued detention. Bail was granted on Rs. 40,000 personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-commission of similar offences, maintaining mobile contact with investigating officer, and refraining from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts