STATE vs BABU ASLAM — 467/2026

Case under Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNT010027922026

Filing Number

836/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

467/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

435-Asj/Spl.FTC North

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

572

Police Station

Model Town

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABU ASLAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case 467/2026 Summary: State vs. Babu Aslam The court granted regular bail to 22-year-old Babu Aslam, accused under Section 25 of the Arms Act, after he had been in judicial custody since November 2025. The court found that since the chargesheet had been filed, investigation was complete, co-accused persons with similar roles were already on bail, and the trial would take substantial time, there was no fruitful purpose in continued detention. Bail was granted on Rs. 40,000 personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-commission of similar offences, maintaining mobile contact with investigating officer, and refraining from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Spl.FTC North

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Spl.FTC North

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 467/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 467/2026 Summary: State vs. Babu Aslam The court granted regular bail to 22-year-old Babu Aslam, accused under Section 25 of the Arms Act, after he had been in judicial custody since November 2025. The court found that since the chargesheet had been filed, investigation was complete, co-accused persons with similar roles were already on bail, and the trial would take substantial time, there was no fruitful purpose in continued detention. Bail was granted on Rs. 40,000 personal bond with surety, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-commission of similar offences, maintaining mobile contact with investigating officer, and refraining from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case