STATE vs MOHD. ARIF — 395/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394,397,452,458,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: DLNE010037932022
Filing Number
2021/2022
Filing Date
17-Nov-2022
Registration No
395/2022
Registration Date
17-Nov-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
413-Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
996
Police Station
Khajuri Khas
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHD. ARIF
-
2.JAAN MOHD. @JAANU
-
3.AKRAM
-
4.DEEN MOHD @ SALMAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: State v. Mohd. Arif & Ors. (SC 395/2022) The court acquitted all four accused—Mohd. Arif, Akram, Jaan Mohd., and Deen Mohd.—of charges under IPC Sections 458/392/34 (burglary and theft), with Arif also acquitted of Section 397 (dacoity). Though the complainant and his wife testified that four boys broke into their home on 16.09.2014 and robbed Rs. 60,000 plus jewelry, both turned hostile and failed to identify any accused in court, citing darkness during the incident. With no corroborating witness testimony or incriminating evidence, the court found insufficient grounds to connect the accused to the alleged offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
02-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
11-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
08-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
30-Oct-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
20-Aug-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
20-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
21-May-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
21-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
10-Mar-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
21-Jan-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
21-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
04-Dec-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
21-Oct-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
21-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
04-Sep-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
25-Jul-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
25-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
01-Jul-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
01-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
03-Jun-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
03-Jun-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
29-Apr-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
29-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
02-Apr-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
02-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
22-Feb-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
22-Feb-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
31-Jan-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
31-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
21-Nov-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
21-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
30-Oct-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
30-Oct-2023
Misc./ Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
24-Aug-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
24-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
28-Jul-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
28-Jul-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
02-May-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
02-May-2023
Proper Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
04-Feb-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Feb-2023
Charge
Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
-
17-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 395/2022
Summary: State v. Mohd. Arif & Ors. (SC 395/2022) The court acquitted all four accused—Mohd. Arif, Akram, Jaan Mohd., and Deen Mohd.—of charges under IPC Sections 458/392/34 (burglary and theft), with Arif also acquitted of Section 397 (dacoity). Though the complainant and his wife testified that four boys broke into their home on 16.09.2014 and robbed Rs. 60,000 plus jewelry, both turned hostile and failed to identify any accused in court, citing darkness during the incident. With no corroborating witness testimony or incriminating evidence, the court found insufficient grounds to connect the accused to the alleged offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts