STATE vs MOHD. ARIF — 395/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394,397,452,458,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: DLNE010037932022
Filing Number
2021/2022
Filing Date
17-11-2022
Registration No
395/2022
Registration Date
17-11-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
413-Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
996
Police Station
Khajuri Khas
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Respondent(s)
MOHD. ARIF
JAAN MOHD. @JAANU
AKRAM
DEEN MOHD @ SALMAN
Hearing History
Judge: 413-Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 30-10-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: State v. Mohd. Arif & Ors. (SC 395/2022) The court acquitted all four accused—Mohd. Arif, Akram, Jaan Mohd., and Deen Mohd.—of charges under IPC Sections 458/392/34 (burglary and theft), with Arif also acquitted of Section 397 (dacoity). Though the complainant and his wife testified that four boys broke into their home on 16.09.2014 and robbed Rs. 60,000 plus jewelry, both turned hostile and failed to identify any accused in court, citing darkness during the incident. With no corroborating witness testimony or incriminating evidence, the court found insufficient grounds to connect the accused to the alleged offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: State v. Mohd. Arif & Ors. (SC 395/2022) The court acquitted all four accused—Mohd. Arif, Akram, Jaan Mohd., and Deen Mohd.—of charges under IPC Sections 458/392/34 (burglary and theft), with Arif also acquitted of Section 397 (dacoity). Though the complainant and his wife testified that four boys broke into their home on 16.09.2014 and robbed Rs. 60,000 plus jewelry, both turned hostile and failed to identify any accused in court, citing darkness during the incident. With no corroborating witness testimony or incriminating evidence, the court found insufficient grounds to connect the accused to the alleged offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts