RASHMI vs PANKAJ — 279/2025

Case under Suit for Declaration Section 151. Status: Misc. cases. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.

Misc. cases Next hearing 18-Aug-2026 in 1 week

CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLNE010021522025

e-Filing Number

24-07-2025

Filing Number

1135/2025

Filing Date

25-Jul-2025

Registration No

279/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

429-District Judge

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Suit for Declaration Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASHMI

    Adv. Khyali Ram Rana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ

Case History

  1. 18-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  3. 06-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CS 279/25 - RASHMI v. PANKAJ The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint, correcting the property area from 250 square yards to 163.38 square yards as per theLocum Tenens report. The defendant's amended written statement was taken on record without objection, and a previously imposed cost was waived. The defendant conceded that the property is located in Delhi (not Ghaziabad, UP) and was granted time to file an amended application. Case adjourned to 10.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 25-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 279/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CS 279/25 - RASHMI v. PANKAJ The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint, correcting the property area from 250 square yards to 163.38 square yards as per theLocum Tenens report. The defendant's amended written statement was taken on record without objection, and a previously imposed cost was waived. The defendant conceded that the property is located in Delhi (not Ghaziabad, UP) and was granted time to file an amended application. Case adjourned to 10.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case