JASBIR SINGH vs NARENDER SINGH — 88/2019
Case under Civil Cases Section 136. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG. CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLND010208392019
Filing Number
16935/2019
Filing Date
02-11-2019
Registration No
88/2019
Registration Date
04-11-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASBIR SINGH
Adv. DEVENDER DAGAR
Respondent(s)
NARENDER SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District Judge-03
Disposed
Order
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 12-02-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Jasbir Singh v. Narender Singh (RCA DJ 88/2019) The appellate court dismissed Jasbir Singh's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his permanent injunction suit. Singh claimed sole ownership of a 660 sq. yard ancestral property in Mahipalpur, New Delhi, but the court found he failed to establish any independent right or title. The court noted that Singh admitted the property was joint family property with multiple co-sharers, produced no documentary evidence of ownership, and could not explain why his uncles and brothers allegedly transferred their shares to him orally without written proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Jasbir Singh v. Narender Singh (RCA DJ 88/2019) The appellate court dismissed Jasbir Singh's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his permanent injunction suit. Singh claimed sole ownership of a 660 sq. yard ancestral property in Mahipalpur, New Delhi, but the court found he failed to establish any independent right or title. The court noted that Singh admitted the property was joint family property with multiple co-sharers, produced no documentary evidence of ownership, and could not explain why his uncles and brothers allegedly transferred their shares to him orally without written proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts