JASBIR SINGH vs NARENDER SINGH — 88/2019
Case under Civil Cases Section 136. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG. CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLND010208392019
Filing Number
16935/2019
Filing Date
02-Nov-2019
Registration No
88/2019
Registration Date
04-Nov-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASBIR SINGH
Adv. DEVENDER DAGAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARENDER SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Jasbir Singh v. Narender Singh (RCA DJ 88/2019) The appellate court dismissed Jasbir Singh's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his permanent injunction suit. Singh claimed sole ownership of a 660 sq. yard ancestral property in Mahipalpur, New Delhi, but the court found he failed to establish any independent right or title. The court noted that Singh admitted the property was joint family property with multiple co-sharers, produced no documentary evidence of ownership, and could not explain why his uncles and brothers allegedly transferred their shares to him orally without written proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-03
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
27-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
12-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
24-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
27-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
24-Sep-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
02-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
02-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
25-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
18-Sep-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
18-Sep-2024
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
09-Sep-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Sep-2024
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
06-Jun-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
06-Jun-2024
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
28-May-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
28-May-2024
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
10-Apr-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Apr-2024
Final Arguments
District Judge-03
-
08-Dec-2023
Final Arguments
-
08-Aug-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
08-Aug-2023
Final Arguments
-
13-Mar-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2023
Final Arguments
-
14-Nov-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Nov-2022
Final Arguments
-
29-Apr-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
29-Apr-2022
Final Arguments
-
09-Dec-2021
Final Arguments
-
24-Jul-2021
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Jul-2021
Final Arguments
-
18-Feb-2021
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
18-Feb-2021
Final Arguments
-
23-Sep-2020
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-Sep-2020
Final Arguments
-
29-Jul-2020
Misc. cases
-
08-Jun-2020
Misc. cases
-
18-May-2020
Misc. cases
-
17-Feb-2020
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2020
Misc. cases
-
04-Nov-2019
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2019
Case Summary: Jasbir Singh v. Narender Singh (RCA DJ 88/2019) The appellate court dismissed Jasbir Singh's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his permanent injunction suit. Singh claimed sole ownership of a 660 sq. yard ancestral property in Mahipalpur, New Delhi, but the court found he failed to establish any independent right or title. The court noted that Singh admitted the property was joint family property with multiple co-sharers, produced no documentary evidence of ownership, and could not explain why his uncles and brothers allegedly transferred their shares to him orally without written proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts