SHRI SAIYID SIRAJUL HASAN vs SHRI SYED MURTAZA ALI KHAN AND ORS — 468/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 1. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 28th April 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010093392022
Filing Number
5410/2022
Filing Date
23-05-1972
Registration No
468/2022
Registration Date
23-05-1972
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI SAIYID SIRAJUL HASAN
Adv. FILE RECEIVED FROM THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Respondent(s)
SHRI SYED MURTAZA ALI KHAN AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Clarification
Misc. cases
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Order |
| 30-03-2026 | Clarification |
| 17-03-2026 | Misc. cases |
| 13-03-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Saiyid Sirajul Hasan v. Syed Murtaza Ali Khan & Ors, Case 468/2022 The court partially decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that 66 jewelry items and certain diamonds (listed in Exhibits 1 and item 4 of Exhibit 2) were the private property of the deceased Nawab Raza Ali Khan, which devolve upon his legal heirs under Muslim Personal Law (Shia sect) rather than under primogeniture. However, the court rejected claims to three jewelry items gifted to defendant no. 2 at her marriage and seven heirloom jewelry items, which remain impartible and vest exclusively with the eldest heir under succession law as clarified by Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: Saiyid Sirajul Hasan v. Syed Murtaza Ali Khan & Ors, Case 468/2022 The court partially decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that 66 jewelry items and certain diamonds (listed in Exhibits 1 and item 4 of Exhibit 2) were the private property of the deceased Nawab Raza Ali Khan, which devolve upon his legal heirs under Muslim Personal Law (Shia sect) rather than under primogeniture. However, the court rejected claims to three jewelry items gifted to defendant no. 2 at her marriage and seven heirloom jewelry items, which remain impartible and vest exclusively with the eldest heir under succession law as clarified by Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts