HAWA SINGH vs RANDHIR SINGH RANA — 587/2017
Case under Possession and Permanent Injuction Section 79. Status: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010068752017
Filing Number
5477/2017
Filing Date
18-May-2017
Registration No
587/2017
Registration Date
19-May-2017
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HAWA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANDHIR SINGH RANA
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CS 587/2017 — Hawa Singh v. Randhir Singh & Anr. The plaintiff's legal representatives filed an application under Order 7 Rule 14 of CPC seeking permission to file additional documents (sale deeds to 18 prospective buyers and personal documents like Ration Card and savings account) after the suit was filed, citing the plaintiff's old age and delayed procurement. The court dismissed the application, finding the plaintiff's explanation unsatisfactory regarding why documents allegedly in his possession since inception were not filed with the original suit, and rejecting arguments that documents relating to other land sales were relevant to the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge-03
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
01-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
01-Nov-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
03-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
03-May-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
16-Jan-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
16-Jan-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
25-Jul-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
25-Jul-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
28-Mar-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
28-Mar-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
09-Nov-2023
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Nov-2023
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
-
20-Sep-2023
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
-
06-Apr-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
06-Apr-2023
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
-
10-Nov-2022
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
-
26-Apr-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
26-Apr-2022
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
-
17-Nov-2021
Misc. Arguments
-
08-Jul-2021
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
08-Jul-2021
Misc. Arguments
-
21-Jan-2021
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
21-Jan-2021
Misc. Arguments
-
25-Aug-2020
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
25-Aug-2020
Misc. Arguments
-
30-Jun-2020
Misc. Arguments
-
08-May-2020
Misc. Arguments
-
09-Apr-2020
Misc. Arguments
-
19-Dec-2019
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
19-Dec-2019
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
19-Dec-2019
Misc. Arguments
-
18-Jul-2019
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
18-Jul-2019
Misc. Arguments
-
07-Feb-2019
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
07-Feb-2019
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
-
27-Sep-2018
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2018
Misc. Arguments
-
10-May-2018
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
10-May-2018
Misc. Arguments
-
16-Nov-2017
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Nov-2017
Issues
-
18-Sep-2017
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
18-Sep-2017
Issues
Additional District Judge-01
-
20-Jul-2017
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
20-Jul-2017
Misc. cases
Additional District Judge-01
-
19-May-2017
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
19-May-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 587/2017
Case Summary: CS 587/2017 — Hawa Singh v. Randhir Singh & Anr. The plaintiff's legal representatives filed an application under Order 7 Rule 14 of CPC seeking permission to file additional documents (sale deeds to 18 prospective buyers and personal documents like Ration Card and savings account) after the suit was filed, citing the plaintiff's old age and delayed procurement. The court dismissed the application, finding the plaintiff's explanation unsatisfactory regarding why documents allegedly in his possession since inception were not filed with the original suit, and rejecting arguments that documents relating to other land sales were relevant to the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts