M/s PINE LABS PVT. LTD. vs IB MONOTARO PVT. LTD. — 231/2024
Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010037082024
e-Filing Number
22-04-2024
Filing Number
2494/2024
Filing Date
23-Apr-2024
Registration No
231/2024
Registration Date
02-May-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s PINE LABS PVT. LTD.
Adv. Amita Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.IB MONOTARO PVT. LTD.
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CS 231/2024 Pine Labs' objection to maintainability was dismissed. The court held that Pine Labs' suit for recovery of Rs. 4,98,380.96 inadvertently transferred to IB Monotaro due to technical error is not subject to the arbitration clause in their service agreement, as the disputed amount is unrelated to contractual services. The suit is therefore maintainable under general law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Issues
District Judge-03
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
15-Nov-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
23-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-May-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
10-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Feb-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
26-Nov-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
26-Nov-2024
Misc. cases
District Judge-03
-
26-Nov-2024
Issues
District Judge-03
-
05-Aug-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
05-Aug-2024
Misc. cases
District Judge-03
-
08-May-2024
Misc. cases
District Judge-03
-
02-May-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
02-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 231/2024
Case Summary: CS 231/2024 Pine Labs' objection to maintainability was dismissed. The court held that Pine Labs' suit for recovery of Rs. 4,98,380.96 inadvertently transferred to IB Monotaro due to technical error is not subject to the arbitration clause in their service agreement, as the disputed amount is unrelated to contractual services. The suit is therefore maintainable under general law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts