POOJA TYAGI vs JITENDER SINGH DHANJAL — 45/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: DLND010016032024

e-Filing Number

19-02-2024

Filing Number

527/2024

Filing Date

20-Feb-2024

Registration No

45/2024

Registration Date

24-Feb-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

10-Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POOJA TYAGI

    Adv. JAIKARAN PANWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JITENDER SINGH DHANJAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    In CA 45/2024, the court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn after both parties settled their dispute regarding a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 offense. The respondent received the final Rs. 3,000 payment from the appellant, completing the agreed settlement of 16.07.2025, and the offense stands compounded following Supreme Court precedent that such offenses can be compounded at any stage, even post-conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  19. 16-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  20. 19-May-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  21. 19-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  22. 05-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  23. 22-Feb-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  24. 22-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  25. 17-Jan-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  26. 17-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  27. 06-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  28. 26-Sep-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  29. 26-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  30. 03-Aug-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  31. 03-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  32. 05-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  33. 25-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  34. 16-Apr-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  35. 16-Apr-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  36. 24-Feb-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  37. 24-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 20-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In CA 45/2024, the court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn after both parties settled their dispute regarding a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 offense. The respondent received the final Rs. 3,000 payment from the appellant, completing the agreed settlement of 16.07.2025, and the offense stands compounded following Supreme Court precedent that such offenses can be compounded at any stage, even post-conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case