POOJA TYAGI vs JITENDER SINGH DHANJAL — 45/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 23rd March 2026.

CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: DLND010016032024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-02-2024

Filing Number

527/2024

Filing Date

20-02-2024

Registration No

45/2024

Registration Date

24-02-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

10-Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC)

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

POOJA TYAGI

Adv. JAIKARAN PANWAR

Respondent(s)

JITENDER SINGH DHANJAL

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC)

23-03-2026

Disposed

14-03-2026

Misc./ Appearance

02-03-2026

Misc./ Appearance

02-02-2026

Misc./ Appearance

05-01-2026

Misc./ Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

In CA 45/2024, the court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn after both parties settled their dispute regarding a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 offense. The respondent received the final Rs. 3,000 payment from the appellant, completing the agreed settlement of 16.07.2025, and the offense stands compounded following Supreme Court precedent that such offenses can be compounded at any stage, even post-conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

24-02-2024
COPY OF ORDER
16-04-2024
COPY OF ORDER
03-08-2024
COPY OF ORDER
26-09-2024
COPY OF ORDER
17-01-2025
COPY OF ORDER
22-02-2025
COPY OF ORDER
19-05-2025
COPY OF ORDER
16-07-2025
COPY OF ORDER
21-08-2025
COPY OF ORDER
26-09-2025
COPY OF ORDER
27-10-2025
COPY OF ORDER
27-11-2025
COPY OF ORDER
05-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
14-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

In CA 45/2024, the court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn after both parties settled their dispute regarding a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 offense. The respondent received the final Rs. 3,000 payment from the appellant, completing the agreed settlement of 16.07.2025, and the offense stands compounded following Supreme Court precedent that such offenses can be compounded at any stage, even post-conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case