M/S IMPACT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. vs SUJIT KUMAR — 64/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419. Status: Misc./ Appearance. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.

Misc./ Appearance Next hearing 18-Jul-2026

CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: DLET010013802026

Filing Number

687/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419

Petitioner(s)

1.M/S IMPACT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.

Respondent(s)

1.SUJIT KUMAR

Case History

18-Jul-2026

Next hearingPending
05-Jun-2026

Copy Of OrderView PDF

Case Summary: CA No. 64/2026 M/S Impact Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sujit Kumar (05.06.2026) The court adjourned the matter to 18.07.2026 after respondent Sujit Kumar could not be located for service of summons. The court directed multiple efforts to trace the respondent, including issuing notices at his previously known addresses (Pitampura and Rohini, Delhi), contacting his bank (HSBC) and his wife's bank (Bank of Baroda), notifying his email, and reaching out to sureties who had provided bail bonds. The complainant was also directed to assist in locating additional addresses of the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
05-Jun-2026

Misc./ Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
11-May-2026

Copy Of OrderView PDF
11-May-2026

Misc./ Appearance

Principal District and Sessions Judge, East District
16-Mar-2026

Copy Of OrderView PDF
16-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
07-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA No. 64/2026 M/S Impact Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sujit Kumar (05.06.2026) The court adjourned the matter to 18.07.2026 after respondent Sujit Kumar could not be located for service of summons. The court directed multiple efforts to trace the respondent, including issuing notices at his previously known addresses (Pitampura and Rohini, Delhi), contacting his bank (HSBC) and his wife's bank (Bank of Baroda), notifying his email, and reaching out to sureties who had provided bail bonds. The complainant was also directed to assist in locating additional addresses of the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.