BABLU vs V K GUPTA ALIAS VINAY KANT GUPTA — 11/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.
RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLET010008222025
e-Filing Number
15-02-2025
Filing Number
439/2025
Filing Date
15-02-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
15-02-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, East, KKD
Judge
419-District Judge
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABLU
Adv. DHEERAJ KUMAR
Respondent(s)
V K GUPTA ALIAS VINAY KANT GUPTA
Hearing History
Judge: 419-District Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-05-2026 | Order |
| 27-04-2026 | Order |
| 04-04-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 14-03-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 11/2025 Summary Bablu v. V.K. Gupta @ Vinay Kant Gupta The District Court dismissed Bablu's appeal against a 2024 trial court judgment awarding V.K. Gupta possession of a shop in Geeta Colony, Delhi, along with Rs. 33,000 in unpaid rent and monthly mesne profits of Rs. 11,000. The appeal was barred by limitation (filed 190+ days late) with insufficient justification for condonation, and on merits, the court found the trial court's findings sound—Bablu failed to substantiate his defense that another party was the actual landlord despite having opportunities to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 11/2025 Summary Bablu v. V.K. Gupta @ Vinay Kant Gupta The District Court dismissed Bablu's appeal against a 2024 trial court judgment awarding V.K. Gupta possession of a shop in Geeta Colony, Delhi, along with Rs. 33,000 in unpaid rent and monthly mesne profits of Rs. 11,000. The appeal was barred by limitation (filed 190+ days late) with insufficient justification for condonation, and on merits, the court found the trial court's findings sound—Bablu failed to substantiate his defense that another party was the actual landlord despite having opportunities to present evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts