STATE OF DELHI vs NEELAM ALIAS DARU BIDI — 452/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLCT010041872026
Filing Number
1515/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
452/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Central, THC
Judge
33-SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS)
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
Civil Lines
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF DELHI
Respondent(s)
NEELAM ALIAS DARU BIDI
Hearing History
Judge: 33-SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS)
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 12-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 09-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: STATE OF DELHI v. NEELAM @ DARU BIDI (452/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Neelam @ Daru Bidi in an NDPS Act Section 21 case. The judge found insufficient incriminating evidence against the accused, noting that the recovered substance was not supplied by her and only a co-accused's disclosure statement (which is inadmissible under law) implicated her. The accused had already cooperated with investigation, and the court imposed standard bail conditions including a Rs. 15,000 personal bond, cooperation with IO, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: STATE OF DELHI v. NEELAM @ DARU BIDI (452/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Neelam @ Daru Bidi in an NDPS Act Section 21 case. The judge found insufficient incriminating evidence against the accused, noting that the recovered substance was not supplied by her and only a co-accused's disclosure statement (which is inadmissible under law) implicated her. The accused had already cooperated with investigation, and the court imposed standard bail conditions including a Rs. 15,000 personal bond, cooperation with IO, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts