SURESH YADAV vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 144/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,303(2),351(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010022962026
Filing Number
2226/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
144/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
NIRMALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESH YADAV
Adv. UNKNOWN
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Suresh Yadav, who had been in judicial custody since February 16, 2026, in connection with a group assault case involving land dispute. The court found that while Yadav's name appeared in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against him for causing injury to any victim, and noted that a co-accused received bail earlier. Yadav was ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, considering the custody period, nature of allegations, and the existence of a counter-case filed by the accused against the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Suresh Yadav, who had been in judicial custody since February 16, 2026, in connection with a group assault case involving land dispute. The court found that while Yadav's name appeared in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against him for causing injury to any victim, and noted that a co-accused received bail earlier. Yadav was ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, considering the custody period, nature of allegations, and the existence of a counter-case filed by the accused against the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts