UMESH MEHTA vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 141/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,74,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010022322026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2166/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
141/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
NIRMALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESH MEHTA
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted bail to accused Umesh Mehta @ Lalan Kumar in a case involving alleged group assault with deadly weapons, injuries, and theft. The court found the accused entitled to bail considering his prolonged judicial custody (since 18.02.2026), the existence of a counter-case filed by the accused against the informant, and that another co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each, with one surety required to be a family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Judge, Supaul granted bail to accused Umesh Mehta @ Lalan Kumar in a case involving alleged group assault with deadly weapons, injuries, and theft. The court found the accused entitled to bail considering his prolonged judicial custody (since 18.02.2026), the existence of a counter-case filed by the accused against the informant, and that another co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each, with one surety required to be a family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts