RITESH DAS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 140/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRSU010022312026

Filing Number

2165/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

140/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

7-Principal District and Session Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

RAJESWARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITESH DAS

    Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected the bail application of Ritesh Das, accused of causing his wife's death by strangulation in an inter-caste marriage case involving dowry harassment. The court found the allegations extremely serious—the deceased died within 2 years of marriage at her matrimonial home with ligature marks on her throat and witness statements confirming cruelty and dowry demands—and determined there was a strong risk of evidence tampering given the investigation's preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Session Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Session Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 140/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected the bail application of Ritesh Das, accused of causing his wife's death by strangulation in an inter-caste marriage case involving dowry harassment. The court found the allegations extremely serious—the deceased died within 2 years of marriage at her matrimonial home with ligature marks on her throat and witness statements confirming cruelty and dowry demands—and determined there was a strong risk of evidence tampering given the investigation's preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case