RITESH DAS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 140/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSU010022312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2165/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
140/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
7-Principal District and Session Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
RAJESWARI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RITESH DAS
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Principal District and Session Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected the bail application of Ritesh Das, accused of causing his wife's death by strangulation in an inter-caste marriage case involving dowry harassment. The court found the allegations extremely serious—the deceased died within 2 years of marriage at her matrimonial home with ligature marks on her throat and witness statements confirming cruelty and dowry demands—and determined there was a strong risk of evidence tampering given the investigation's preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge, Supaul rejected the bail application of Ritesh Das, accused of causing his wife's death by strangulation in an inter-caste marriage case involving dowry harassment. The court found the allegations extremely serious—the deceased died within 2 years of marriage at her matrimonial home with ligature marks on her throat and witness statements confirming cruelty and dowry demands—and determined there was a strong risk of evidence tampering given the investigation's preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts