SIKENDRA YADAV AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 253/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(20,126(2),115(2),118(1),109,117(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 22nd May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSU010015942026
Filing Number
1548/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Supaul
Judge
1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
309
Police Station
PIPRA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIKENDRA YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR JHA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 08-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 253/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five accused (Sikander Yadav, Lal Yadav, Bijendra Yadav, Bhushan Yadav, and Raushan Yadav). The accused were charged with serious offenses including armed assault, firing weapons, and SC/ST atrocities against a scheduled caste informant on 12/09/25. The court found the case credible based on witness statements and injury reports showing 13 persons injured with 5 sustaining grievous injuries, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which makes anticipatory bail non-maintainable in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 253/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five accused (Sikander Yadav, Lal Yadav, Bijendra Yadav, Bhushan Yadav, and Raushan Yadav). The accused were charged with serious offenses including armed assault, firing weapons, and SC/ST atrocities against a scheduled caste informant on 12/09/25. The court found the case credible based on witness statements and injury reports showing 13 persons injured with 5 sustaining grievous injuries, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which makes anticipatory bail non-maintainable in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts