SIKENDRA YADAV AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY — 253/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(20,126(2),115(2),118(1),109,117(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSU010015942026

Filing Number

1548/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Supaul

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

309

Police Station

PIPRA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(20,126(2),115(2),118(1),109,117(2),352,351(2)
Arms Act Section 27
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIKENDRA YADAV AND OTHERS

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - JAI NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 253/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five accused (Sikander Yadav, Lal Yadav, Bijendra Yadav, Bhushan Yadav, and Raushan Yadav). The accused were charged with serious offenses including armed assault, firing weapons, and SC/ST atrocities against a scheduled caste informant on 12/09/25. The court found the case credible based on witness statements and injury reports showing 13 persons injured with 5 sustaining grievous injuries, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which makes anticipatory bail non-maintainable in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 253/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by five accused (Sikander Yadav, Lal Yadav, Bijendra Yadav, Bhushan Yadav, and Raushan Yadav). The accused were charged with serious offenses including armed assault, firing weapons, and SC/ST atrocities against a scheduled caste informant on 12/09/25. The court found the case credible based on witness statements and injury reports showing 13 persons injured with 5 sustaining grievous injuries, and applied Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, which makes anticipatory bail non-maintainable in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case