NEHAL AHAMAD vs State of Bihar — 259/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 15th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRST010012212026
Filing Number
1096/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
259/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Sitamarhi
Judge
2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
423
Police Station
PUPRI
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NEHAL AHAMAD
Adv. PRABHAS KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge
Disposed
HEARING
Restored
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 08-04-2026 | Restored |
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 259/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge I, Sitamarhi rejected Nehal Ahmad's bail application in a motorcycle theft case (Section 379 IPC). The court found prima facie evidence of Ahmad's involvement based on CCTV footage showing him assisting in stealing a Honda motorcycle and coordinating with co-accused persons, along with recovery of the stolen vehicle. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of allegations, electronic evidence, and property recovery, noting no substantial change in circumstances since an earlier bail rejection on 19.02.2026. However, Ahmad may renew his bail application after six months or earlier if charges are not framed or trial concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 259/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge I, Sitamarhi rejected Nehal Ahmad's bail application in a motorcycle theft case (Section 379 IPC). The court found prima facie evidence of Ahmad's involvement based on CCTV footage showing him assisting in stealing a Honda motorcycle and coordinating with co-accused persons, along with recovery of the stolen vehicle. The court denied bail considering the serious nature of allegations, electronic evidence, and property recovery, noting no substantial change in circumstances since an earlier bail rejection on 19.02.2026. However, Ahmad may renew his bail application after six months or earlier if charges are not framed or trial concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts