Guddu Yadav vs State of Bihar — 4784/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 341,323,498(a). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 18th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010150642025
e-Filing Number
06-12-2025
Filing Number
13779/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
4784/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
DAUDPUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Guddu Yadav
Adv. Vikash kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary: The court dismissed Guddu Yadav's anticipatory bail petition filed in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case (IPC sections 341, 323, 498(A)). The court held the petition unmaintainable as the petitioner and other accused had already been granted liberty under CrPC section 41(i)(a), and the dispute was purely matrimonial in nature. The learned court was directed to decide the case independently without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
10-Jan-2026
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4784/2025
Court Decision Summary: The court dismissed Guddu Yadav's anticipatory bail petition filed in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case (IPC sections 341, 323, 498(A)). The court held the petition unmaintainable as the petitioner and other accused had already been granted liberty under CrPC section 41(i)(a), and the dispute was purely matrimonial in nature. The learned court was directed to decide the case independently without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts