Deepak Kumar alias Billa vs State of Bihar — 518/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(2). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010045092026

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

4190/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

518/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

363

Police Station

EKMA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Kumar alias Billa

    Adv. Narendra Kumar Dubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Deepak Kumar alias Billa in a theft case, finding that his involvement rested solely on a co-accused's confessional statement with no corroborating evidence against him. The court set bail at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering his period of custody and lack of direct evidence linking him to the alleged house burglary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 518/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Deepak Kumar alias Billa in a theft case, finding that his involvement rested solely on a co-accused's confessional statement with no corroborating evidence against him. The court set bail at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, considering his period of custody and lack of direct evidence linking him to the alleged house burglary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case