ANIL KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 942/2026

Case under Railways Act Section 160(2). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036862026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3443/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

942/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

265

Police Station

RPF MUZAFFARPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Railways Act Section 160(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR

    Adv. Mudhurendra kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anil Kumar, accused under Section 160(2) of the Railway Act for allegedly damaging a railway gate (loss of Rs. 6,000), considering his clean antecedent and willingness to compensate the Railway. The petitioner must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, deposit Rs. 6,000 to the Railway department, cooperate with investigation, and comply with standard bail conditions including non-interference with witnesses and remaining in India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 942/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anil Kumar, accused under Section 160(2) of the Railway Act for allegedly damaging a railway gate (loss of Rs. 6,000), considering his clean antecedent and willingness to compensate the Railway. The petitioner must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, deposit Rs. 6,000 to the Railway department, cooperate with investigation, and comply with standard bail conditions including non-interference with witnesses and remaining in India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case