Madhaw Kumar vs State of Bihar — 939/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,117(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010036782026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
3436/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
939/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
DORIGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhaw Kumar
Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh
Reetu Kumari
Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh
Manju Devi
Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh
Ramchandra Sah
Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition of four accused (Madhaw Kumar, Reetu Kumari, Manju Devi, and Ramchandra Sah) in an assault case, primarily because the parties had amicably settled their dispute through compromise, the allegations were general in nature, and the accused had clean criminal antecedents. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition of four accused (Madhaw Kumar, Reetu Kumari, Manju Devi, and Ramchandra Sah) in an assault case, primarily because the parties had amicably settled their dispute through compromise, the allegations were general in nature, and the accused had clean criminal antecedents. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts