Madhaw Kumar vs State of Bihar — 939/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,117(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036782026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3436/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

939/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

DORIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,117(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Madhaw Kumar

    Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh

  2. 2.Reetu Kumari

    Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh

  3. 3.Manju Devi

    Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh

  4. 4.Ramchandra Sah

    Adv. Ganesh Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition of four accused (Madhaw Kumar, Reetu Kumari, Manju Devi, and Ramchandra Sah) in an assault case, primarily because the parties had amicably settled their dispute through compromise, the allegations were general in nature, and the accused had clean criminal antecedents. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 939/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition of four accused (Madhaw Kumar, Reetu Kumari, Manju Devi, and Ramchandra Sah) in an assault case, primarily because the parties had amicably settled their dispute through compromise, the allegations were general in nature, and the accused had clean criminal antecedents. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case