Jitendra Sah vs State of Bihar — 938/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),110,76,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010036772026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3435/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

938/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Allowed

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

DORIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),110,76,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jitendra Sah

    Adv. Anup kumar srivastava

  2. 2.Abhishek Kumar

    Adv. Anup kumar srivastava

  3. 3.Lalita Devi

    Adv. Anup kumar srivastava

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Jitendra Sah, Abhishek Kumar, and Lalita Devi in a case involving charges of attempted murder, assault, and theft. The court allowed the petition primarily because the dispute arose from a counter-case stemming from the same incident, and both parties amicably resolved their differences through a signed compromise agreement. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 938/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Jitendra Sah, Abhishek Kumar, and Lalita Devi in a case involving charges of attempted murder, assault, and theft. The court allowed the petition primarily because the dispute arose from a counter-case stemming from the same incident, and both parties amicably resolved their differences through a signed compromise agreement. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case