Jitendra Sah vs State of Bihar — 938/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),110,76,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Allowed on 10th March 2026.
A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRSR010036772026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
3435/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
938/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saran at Chapra
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
DORIGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jitendra Sah
Adv. Anup kumar srivastava
Abhishek Kumar
Adv. Anup kumar srivastava
Lalita Devi
Adv. Anup kumar srivastava
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Jitendra Sah, Abhishek Kumar, and Lalita Devi in a case involving charges of attempted murder, assault, and theft. The court allowed the petition primarily because the dispute arose from a counter-case stemming from the same incident, and both parties amicably resolved their differences through a signed compromise agreement. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Jitendra Sah, Abhishek Kumar, and Lalita Devi in a case involving charges of attempted murder, assault, and theft. The court allowed the petition primarily because the dispute arose from a counter-case stemming from the same incident, and both parties amicably resolved their differences through a signed compromise agreement. The accused were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, cooperation in trial, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts