Laxman Kumar Yadav alias Umesh Yadav vs State of Bihar — 405/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010036492026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

3408/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

405/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

261

Police Station

RIVIL GANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Kumar Yadav alias Umesh Yadav

    Adv. Shashi Bhushan Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition of Laxman Kumar Yadav, accused of murdering his wife in their matrimonial home and disposing of her body, citing the serious nature of allegations involving dowry demand and the need for detailed investigation. The court considered that earlier bail applications by the accused and co-accused had been rejected, and found the case unsuitable for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 405/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of Laxman Kumar Yadav, accused of murdering his wife in their matrimonial home and disposing of her body, citing the serious nature of allegations involving dowry demand and the need for detailed investigation. The court considered that earlier bail applications by the accused and co-accused had been rejected, and found the case unsuitable for bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case