Vinay Mahto alias Vinay Kumar Mahto vs State of Bihar — 353/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

B.p - Regular Bail

CNR: BRSR010031602026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

2941/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

353/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

5-4th D.A.S.J.

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

830

Police Station

SONEPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinay Mahto alias Vinay Kumar Mahto

    Adv. Jitendta Prasad Ray

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Vinay Mahto, who is accused of assaulting Bali Ram Mahto with sticks and weapons, resulting in the victim's death from head injuries. The court found the allegations serious, noted the investigation is still pending, and determined that despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, the gravity of the offense warrants continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th D.A.S.J.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Lcr

    4th D.A.S.J.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Case Diary

    4th D.A.S.J.

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 353/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Vinay Mahto, who is accused of assaulting Bali Ram Mahto with sticks and weapons, resulting in the victim's death from head injuries. The court found the allegations serious, noted the investigation is still pending, and determined that despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, the gravity of the offense warrants continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case