VISHAL SINGH ALIAS VISHAL KUMAR SINGH vs State of Bihar — 382/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(2). Disposed: Contested--Bail Rejected on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

A.b.p - Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSR010012212026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

1141/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

382/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saran at Chapra

Judge

3-1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Rejected

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

361

Police Station

RIVIL GANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(2)
Explosive Substances Act Section 4/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL SINGH ALIAS VISHAL KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. Rajnish kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Vishal Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving bomb attacks on a residence under BNS Section 351(2) and the Explosive Substance Act. The court found strong prosecution evidence including eyewitness statements, the petitioner's prior criminal cases, and pending forensic reports, making the gravity of allegations incompatible with bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st D.A.S.J. -cum- Spl.Children Court

  8. 24-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 382/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Vishal Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving bomb attacks on a residence under BNS Section 351(2) and the Explosive Substance Act. The court found strong prosecution evidence including eyewitness statements, the petitioner's prior criminal cases, and pending forensic reports, making the gravity of allegations incompatible with bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case