AMARJEET SINGH vs State of Bihar — 149/2026
Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)a,26. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRSH010018622026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1804/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
149/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
228
Police Station
SONBARSA RAJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMARJEET SINGH
Adv. Gauri Shanker
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the regular bail application of Amarjeet Singh, accused under the Arms Act, finding that a country-made pistol with live cartridge was recovered from his exclusive possession and he has prior criminal history including a previous arms case. The court declined bail until charges are framed, citing flight risk and possibility of repeating serious offences, but allowed the accused to renew the bail application after charge sheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the regular bail application of Amarjeet Singh, accused under the Arms Act, finding that a country-made pistol with live cartridge was recovered from his exclusive possession and he has prior criminal history including a previous arms case. The court declined bail until charges are framed, citing flight risk and possibility of repeating serious offences, but allowed the accused to renew the bail application after charge sheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts