TARUN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 151/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 338,336(3),336(4),351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRSH010011692026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

1136/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

151/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

6-District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

SAHARSA SADAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 338,336(3),336(4),351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARUN KUMAR

    Adv. Shardakant Jha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: The District Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Tarun Kumar in a forgery and criminal intimidation case, holding that without expert forensic evidence confirming signature forgery, the allegations remain unproven. The court released him on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, valid for six weeks, but reserved the informant's right to seek bail cancellation if expert opinion later establishes forgery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Aditional Sessions Judge-IV

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Tarun Kumar in a forgery and criminal intimidation case, holding that without expert forensic evidence confirming signature forgery, the allegations remain unproven. The court released him on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, valid for six weeks, but reserved the informant's right to seek bail cancellation if expert opinion later establishes forgery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case