Sandip Kumar vs State of Bihar — 581/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO010026632026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

2413/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

581/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

28-District And Additional Sessions Judge-11

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

ROHTAS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,351(2),191

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sandip Kumar

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  2. 2.Ranjit Kumar

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  3. 3.Mohit Kumar

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  4. 4.Manju Devi alias Seema Devi

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  5. 5.Ravi Kumar

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  6. 6.Sonu Kumar

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  7. 7.Raju Kumar alias Bainda

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

  8. 8.Raju Choudhary

    Adv. AQIL ASHRAF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    allowedView PDF

    Case Summary: 581/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge-XI granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault during a Holi celebration incident. The court found the allegations lacked merit, noting that prosecution witnesses were the informant's brothers, injuries were simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal history. The judge concluded the case appeared motivated by enmity, particularly since one petitioner's wife had filed a separate SC/ST case against the informant. The petitioners were released on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties each within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-11

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-11

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-11

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-11

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 581/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 581/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge-XI granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault during a Holi celebration incident. The court found the allegations lacked merit, noting that prosecution witnesses were the informant's brothers, injuries were simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal history. The judge concluded the case appeared motivated by enmity, particularly since one petitioner's wife had filed a separate SC/ST case against the informant. The petitioners were released on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties each within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case