Sandip Kumar vs State of Bihar — 581/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010026632026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
2413/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
581/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
28-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-11
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
ROHTAS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandip Kumar
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Ranjit Kumar
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Mohit Kumar
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Manju Devi alias Seema Devi
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Ravi Kumar
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Sonu Kumar
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Raju Kumar alias Bainda
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Raju Choudhary
Adv. AQIL ASHRAF
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 28-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-11
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 581/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge-XI granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault during a Holi celebration incident. The court found the allegations lacked merit, noting that prosecution witnesses were the informant's brothers, injuries were simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal history. The judge concluded the case appeared motivated by enmity, particularly since one petitioner's wife had filed a separate SC/ST case against the informant. The petitioners were released on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties each within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 581/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge-XI granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners accused of assault during a Holi celebration incident. The court found the allegations lacked merit, noting that prosecution witnesses were the informant's brothers, injuries were simple in nature, and the petitioners had no criminal history. The judge concluded the case appeared motivated by enmity, particularly since one petitioner's wife had filed a separate SC/ST case against the informant. The petitioners were released on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties each within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts