Ashok Choudhary vs State of Bihar — 236/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Bail Petition - Regular Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010023452026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
2122/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
236/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
SASARAM, KARWANDIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Choudhary
Adv. Amit Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court rejected Ashok Chaudhary's bail petition in a case involving serious charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that allegations indicate the petitioner was central to forbidden activities, fled from police executing a court-issued arrest warrant, and his family members caused serious injuries to an ASI during warrant execution. Considering these grave circumstances, his prior criminal antecedents (2007 and 2021 excise cases), and the pattern of lawlessness, the court refused regular bail and directed the lower court to expedite proceedings upon investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected Ashok Chaudhary's bail petition in a case involving serious charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that allegations indicate the petitioner was central to forbidden activities, fled from police executing a court-issued arrest warrant, and his family members caused serious injuries to an ASI during warrant execution. Considering these grave circumstances, his prior criminal antecedents (2007 and 2021 excise cases), and the pattern of lawlessness, the court refused regular bail and directed the lower court to expedite proceedings upon investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts