ANIL CHOUDHARY vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 408/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO010018422026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

1675/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

408/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

5-District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

280

Police Station

NOKHA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL CHOUDHARY

    Adv. Rabindra Chaturbedy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    RejectedView PDF

    Court Decision Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Anil Choudhary's anticipatory bail petition under Section 317(5) BNS. The court found that Choudhary was named by his own son (Pintu Kumar), a main accused, for allegedly assisting in concealing stolen property, and that a large quantity of stolen goods was recovered based on the son's disclosure statement. The court determined that the nature of allegations and available case evidence warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Anil Choudhary's anticipatory bail petition under Section 317(5) BNS. The court found that Choudhary was named by his own son (Pintu Kumar), a main accused, for allegedly assisting in concealing stolen property, and that a large quantity of stolen goods was recovered based on the son's disclosure statement. The court determined that the nature of allegations and available case evidence warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case