RANJAN PASWAN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 301/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),126(2),115(2),117(2),109. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010013852026
e-Filing Number
03-02-2026
Filing Number
1256/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
301/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
DEHRI MUFFASIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANJAN PASWAN
Adv. Ravindra Kumar Singh
MANJU DEVI
Adv. Ravindra Kumar Singh
SHIBU KUMAR
Adv. Ravindra Kumar Singh
PAWAN PASWAN
Adv. Ravindra Kumar Singh
CHATURI PASWAN
Adv. Ravindra Kumar Singh
URMILA DEVI
Adv. Ravindra Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 301/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Rohtas granted anticipatory bail to Ranjan Paswan, Manju Devi, and Shibu Kumar in connection with assault charges (FIR 202/2025). Although the FIR alleged they assaulted the informant causing injuries, the court found no specific allegations attributing injuries to any petitioner, and the informant and injured parties filed affidavits stating injuries were simple and they had recovered. The court released the petitioners on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, considering the land dispute context, lack of criminal antecedents, and case compromise between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 301/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Rohtas granted anticipatory bail to Ranjan Paswan, Manju Devi, and Shibu Kumar in connection with assault charges (FIR 202/2025). Although the FIR alleged they assaulted the informant causing injuries, the court found no specific allegations attributing injuries to any petitioner, and the informant and injured parties filed affidavits stating injuries were simple and they had recovered. The court released the petitioners on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, considering the land dispute context, lack of criminal antecedents, and case compromise between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts